I just can't take it anymore. I have got to say something. I have been passively standing back, reading and agonizing over article after article, feeling increasingly saddened and, to be perfectly frank, hurt by so much of what is being discussed regarding Kate Kelly. Up until now I have resisted the impulse to speak up because I do not want to throw another thought piece into the proverbial den of lions that seems to characterize the current arena of dialogue, just to see it devoured by bitterness and negativity. But I am relenting.
What I have to say actually has very little to do with the details of the Ordain Women leader's excommunication from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and more to do with the overall shadow of pessimism and doubt I see lurking in all corners of the social network world in response to it. This is not the first time a person of such influence among members of the church has been formally disciplined by Church leadership, nor is it even the first time a high profile individual has made their separation from the Church so public. Why then are so many members suddenly questioning their own faith and standing in the aftermath of all of this?
One reason might be the communication age that we live in. Before when a difficult event might have resulted in significant self-reflection of members' loyalty and testimony, those thoughts and feelings were stewed over in the privacy of their own minds and perhaps discussed within the circle of trusted friends and family members. With today's technological landscape however, these same sort of feelings are discussed in such a public and sensational way that if a reader wasn't already inclined to second guess his testimony, suddenly it would appear that maybe he should be! It reminds me of a talk given by President Spencer W. Kimball in 1971 in which he cites the Apostle Paul's prophecies of the latter days:
" 'There are … so many kinds of voices in the world, and none of them is without signification.” (1 Cor. 14:8–10.)
Paul’s was an impressive voice, powerful and strong, never silenced in all the interim centuries. There are voices all about us. Some are harsh and raucous, others sweet and penetrating. Paul’s revelations included visions of these latter days. His voice is saying: “… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;' "
So is that it? Is it simply a matter of deception? As interesting to consider as this theory might be, it still doesn't approach the crux of the issue for me. In fact, it simply begs the question in a new light. Why are some members of the Church so easily swayed by the voices and opinions and intellectual extrapolations of others? What is it about someone else's spiritual descent that causes some to question their own path?
The answer for me is a tough one, because it is completely inconclusive.
I. Just. Don't. Know.
I can guess, I can theorize, but when it comes down to it I just do not know why certain people hold on and others let go. All I know is what makes me remain. That is what I want to share.
I am a devout, "card carrying" Mormon. In fact, I have often been labeled what is referred to in Mormon culture, a "Molly Mormon". I don't drink caffeine of any kind, I still kind of cringe when I hear the word "butt" (I struggled to even type out the letters, you guys), I cheer for BYU, and I keep a blog about my family life. Pretty much, I make a lot of people in my home town of Logan, Utah crazy (I love you all dearly). I have always been bothered by the tag Molly Mormon. It seems to imply either an air of selfrighteous superiority or of blind compliance to the finest details of gospel living, as though the bearer of the moniker is somehow incapable of or unwilling to think for herself. I'm not sure which application is more insulting, but I reject both whole heartedly. The choices I make are very personal and have absolutely nothing to do with anyone else around me and have everything to do with my relationship with Heavenly Father only. Also, I realize I don't have a brilliant mind, but I do consider myself a proficient thinker. To suggest that following the tenants of my religion with rigidity infers a level of blind obedience is to overlook the entire concept of faith.
Must we always understand something completely before being willing to obey? To me, part of demonstrating faith is seeking first to obey, then to understand. Isn't this the pattern of faith that is found again and again in the scriptures? Namaan must have thought washing in the filthy muck of the Jordan River was the last thing that could possibly cleanse him from his leprosy. But he obeyed. And was healed. The children of Israel must have wondered how on earth staring at a serpent on a stick could ever save a person from death. But those who complied lived.
People of faith are often accused of following blindly. But anyone who lays such an accusation on me and concludes that I must remain in the Church because I have never taken the time or had the courage to examine tough issues is simply wrong. Do you think I don't know the feeling of lying awake in bed unable to sleep at 2:00 in the morning because my brain is wresting on the concept of Eternity and the actual existence of God? Or because my heart is breaking over the principle of polygamy or the historically exclusive nature of the priesthood? Or because I'm angry that I was never taught about certain parts of our church history? Or maybe you think I haven't noticed and been upset by the many examples of hypocrisy that can seem so rampant in a church filled by imperfect humans and hierarchal authority.
I am a gospel reader. When I was about sixteen years old I caught the wave of spiritual curiosity and began reading everything I could to learn more. At first this habit was driven primarily by inquisitiveness. But I soon observed that the more I learned, the more my desire to improve the way I lived increased as well. I soon became especially interested in Church History, so when a number of years later I heard about a new book called "A Rough Stone Rolling," by Richard Bushman, I couldn't wait to get my hands on it. It was a comprehensive biography of the Prophet Joseph Smith and perfect for my current leanings. Sadly, I had also heard things about this book that for the first time in my gospel study quest caused me pause. It apparently was creating some level of disturbance in faith among many members of the church because of its unbiased honesty. For a while, I wondered if I should not read it for fear that it might shake my own faith. But I couldn't resist it. My desire is for truth, and if that truth is to be found in difficult things, I will take on the challenge. And so I did.
I approached the book differently than I had with any other book, with the exception of the Book of Mormon. I began each reading with a prayer, pleading for the Holy Ghost to be with me to offer understanding and assurance. When I came to something that was challenging, difficult or uncomfortable, I took time to ponder and pray over it. There were many questions, many long nights, and many, many prayers. When the end of the book finally came, I wept. I wept for Joseph Smith, I wept for the people who killed him, I wept for Emma and the broken hearts of the Saints. But mostly, I wept over the experience I had just had. I felt the Holy Ghost so strongly throughout my reading of that book that it became one of the most tangible and emotional experiences of my spiritual life up to that point. This book that had begun as almost a burden to my soul to read, had become a catalyst for my personal testimony of the prophet Joseph Smith and of the gospel he restored. It certainly wasn't because all my questions in the process of reading had been answered. In fact, I probably had fewer questions satisfied than I had left unanswered. What made my experience such a powerful pinnacle in my spiritual journey were the moments when instead of understanding, comfort was what I received. Comfort in the conclusion of "I don't know." Comfort in relying on faith. The kind of comfort that the Holy Ghost gives when testifying of truth.
This experience was the genesis for all subsequent questioning and lack of understanding I would have as I have chosen to remain faithful to my religion.
There are some things that I. Just. Don't. Know.
For so many, that is difficult to swallow because as finite beings we so desperately want definitive resolutions. To leave questions hanging in the air creates a bogging uncertainty that goes against the very grain of our being.
But for me now, it is okay to not know some things. Because based on moments with the Holy Spirit that cannot be denied or suppressed, there are plenty of things that I do know.
I know that there is a God. I know that Heavenly Father is loving, all knowing, all powerful, kind, forgiving, perfect, just, and that he knows me personally, more than I know myself.
I know that Jesus Christ is His only begotten Son and the Savior of the world. Without Him, I am nothing.
I know that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. He saw God the Father and Jesus Christ in the Sacred Grove and restored Christ's original church, with all the keys of the Holy Priesthood, upon the earth again.
I know that the Book of Mormon that was translated from gold plates, written by ancient prophets on this American continent, is true.
I know that Jesus Christ is at the head of this church. I know that He speaks to a living prophet today, President Thomas S. Monson, who holds those same priesthood keys and leads this church through direct revelation from God.
Because of the things that I do know, I choose to have faith in all the rest. It is because of this that I remain. And always will.